Justice Barrett SHOCK Recusal BACKFIRES on MAGA?!?

Espinoza v Montana is the ruling precedent. I doubt that the school you mentioned will use funds to do catechism.  The reality is that the Blaine Amendments that are falling one after the other were the result of anti-Catholicism. It is bias against Catholics and deserved to fall. The reason anti-Catholicism is a thing now is because these schools don't won't let in unions because of their support of legal abortion.   

Supporting the history of anti-Catholicism is not a good look for your channel. You are siding with protestant bigots. They preached Protestantism is public schools - part of which was stopping the funding of parish schools. You are siding with the Know-Nothings. Again, not a good look.

Espinoza will remain ruling law - this case is just extending that decision. The Court is hearing this because states have not complied with Espinoza. The Supremes will keep going until states get the hint that Know-Nothing Protestantism is bigotry.

Every school that can get regional accreditation should be funded (save for their religious education activities). In DC, there are already Catholic Charter schools - or rather, former parish schools that are now chartered to serve neighborhood kids. 

The reason there is a home school movement is because schools that teach "creation science" cannot be accredited. That is the correct filter.  There are not enough Wiccans or Satanists to have schools. Regardless, Satanism is a form of deprogramming, not the actual worship of the devil. Satanists don't actually believe a devil exists.

The key fact in this analysis has to be the anti-immigrant, anti-Catholic origins of the Blaine Amendments that are still on the books, including in Oklahoma, even after Espinoza - which overturned Montana's Blaine Amendment and its prohibition on public funding of scholarships for students in Catholic schools. As the name suggests, Latino students.

The Blaine Amendments are part of the America First movement that gave us Trumpism. Which side are you on?  And yes, Hebrew Schools should get education funding. They do good work. My wife's cousin's kids went there in Maryland and got great educations. David could afford the tuition with no problem, but not all Jewish kids are rich.

The reason for the separation of church and state rulings was because public schools started out as hegemonically protestant. Kudos to the Jewish and Atheist parents using the ACLU to break that monopoly - but funding high quality schools with a parish sponsor - most often run by a parental school board - not the clergy - is no danger to "religious freedom." The context and history are important.