This blog started out as a companion piece to my book, Musings from the Christian Left (excerpts of which can be found in the July 2004 link) and to support a planned radio show. Now, its simply a long term writing project from a Christian Left Libertarian perspective (meaning I often argue for liberty within the (Catholic) Church, rather than liberty because the church takes care of a conservative view of morality.

Monday, February 22, 2010

The latest on health care reform and abortion

The important piece here is that the proposal coming out of the White House favors the Nelson approach on abortion. Assuming for the sake of argument that the USCCB is correct that this is inadequate, should this mean that it is time for Catholics to demand that reform be scuttled?

Absolutely not and here is why. While it would be good if the Senate reconciliation language brought in Stupak, it is not absolutely necessary that it do so. Indeed, Nelson seems to think that his language does the same thing as Stupak does and without insurance exchanges, it is unclear that Stupak is still necessary. Irregardless, just like for the underlying bill, Reconciliation will not pass the House of Representatives without the Stupak language and if it cannot this language will likely survive Conference (assuming the Senate does not accept it to avoid conference). Here is the beauty of using Reconciliation. In the Senate, last I recall, there were 55 votes in favor of Stupak. For reconciliation, this is enough. If the issue is handled responsibly, the Stupak language is pretty sure to prevail.

The bottom line is, then, that the way things are going Catholics must support health care reform since abortion will be dealt with by the process - this is, of course, if you believe that the Church should have an opinion on such issues. Given the centrality of health coverage for a family in the decision to have a child or abort it (meaning that families without care are more likely to obtain abortions), passing health care reform overall is one of those seemless garment of Life issue (even if Stupak does not pass).


Blogger Hamster said...

If you are against abortion you are going to have to be for some form of health care reform that guarantees the mother of an unborn child access to free healthcare for her and her child if she can't afford it.
Many pregnant women with fetus' that are medically challenge face either having the child and facing mounting medical bills which she cannot afford...or aborting the fetus.

It's irresponsible to demand that a woman give birth to a sick infant only to watch the infant deteriorate due to lack of medical care.

If there is a universal right to life there is also going to have to be universal right to health care to preserve that life after it is born.

This also applies to prenatal care for all expectant mothers so they can be sure they are doing everything they can to bring a healthy baby into the world.

Too many poor people are going without basic health care and giving birth to underweight sick infants with health issues.

7:22 PM

Anonymous fasb rating system said...

Many pregnant women with fetus' that are medically challenge face either having the child and facing mounting medical bills which she cannot afford or aborting the fetus.

12:27 PM


Post a Comment

Links to this post:

Create a Link

<< Home